War, when humanity shows out the Monkey that it has inside

Encara que la mona es vestís de seda, en mona es queda

Translate: Although the monkey dress in silk, in monkey remains

Today September 10th, Syria war is discussing between an international attack (without UN agree) and transfer of Syrian regime chemical weapons to Russian.  Meanwhile civil population is continuing suffer combats between government and revels, what began as a cry for freedom from decades of authoritarian rule and ruthless, it become with a continuation of millennial struggle between Sunni and Shiite, where the revel government in exile has the sad rule of accompaniment of forces that are above them. In this scenario the question is: Will attack serve for something? or, Is there a good side? or better said, Will attack affect any fighters or will only hurt the civilian population?

 

Syrian war is one of a lot of wars that humanity has struggled throughout history. Today there are some wars more in fight around the world these are silencing for the immediacy of day by day. Sadly humans have in violence a main tool for resolve conflicts. Jane Goodall has studied chimpanzees and showed us how similar they are to us. Sometimes we compare our specie with other animals in very naïf form, and we get fail conclusions. It isn’t true that other species never kill individuals of the same species; majority of species are territorials, even simply mollusks, and when other individuals intent to invade their land, they fight until death for defense it. Violence is into own genes, and it’s the easy response at any issue that concern. It doesn’t matter how many literature, art, science or philosophy humanity could have doing in thousands years of history, when we arrived at stopped point of negotiation we resolve to demonstrate who is the stronger.
Currently we are civilized, well the mainly part of time, and we give ourselves tools for avoid the physical fight. One of them and the most important is democracy. Democracy is the better social engine that humanity gave. Its simplicity is the secret of its exit: democracy is only show who is the stronger, because who have the majority of individuals is the stronger. Democracy obviously doesn’t necessary be just, but if the will of majority is satisfied don’t be conflict. The problem begin when the result is fifty – fifty, or worse fifty plus one; in this case the forces are equals and there is the temptation with one of the parts to return at usual animal resolve problems form.
In every age, and sadly in future, wars are doing. The exit of our specie was the collaborative will, but this is only showing in few times. This primate named human is a gregarious species and always work with a leader who gives the orders and the rest of troupe which obeys. We have this recorded in fire in our mind, and sometimes we reproduce this kind of working in others species as bees or ants, which we have given queens; but nobody gives orders in bees and ants, they work in group without leader. The ants and bees behavior can’t be easy to assimilate because order into anarchic system is something inconceivable. But why we gave queen at ants and bees? We can name this individuals leader or Alfa as chimpanzee leader, because the queen born to be queen. The hereditary leader, as a King, is a good solution to avoid conflict in group, but nothing guaranty the quality of leader born, and sometimes group suffers some disaster or even disappearance due the inability of the leader. In other way everyone has a leader in own inside, and some of us think that he/she can be the leader, because this is the natural method to find a leader in our species; obviously this conflict could be resolve with the fight of two individuals, the current leader and pretending, but human is gregarious and immediately it’s creating two sides, and now we have a war.
Territorial or leaderships, war marks ours lives. Companies fight each other with all kind of weapons; workers fight with others colleagues with directive works; even children fight in school for their position in group. And it has one possible end the victory of one and defeat acceptation or death of other. Only the confirmation of the impossibility of victory leads to mutual negotiation, but it’s only a momentary solution, when one of them think that has enough forces, war began other time.
Today on autocrat, son of autocrats family, fights in a war to continue enjoying the leadership of his group, and he hasn’t any remorse to use the cruelest weapons to against who of their group dared to discuss her leadership. He’s a tyrant but this current war doesn’t have any relation of this. Current war began when family Umayyad cut the neck to Ali ibn Abi Talib, and Syria is only one of more scenarios where this war is fighting today. Al-Assad is Alaute other little Islamic confession as Druses which now he gives protection in front Sunites forces becomes of every lands of Islam to destroy both confession and Chiites, which also support two and they are the millenarian origin of war; and it’s just to remember that in the middle there are Christian Orthodox which are there before the Islam but Sunites Salifistes want out too. Both sides are using weapons and methods inhuman against contrary and civilian population; and now USA wants to punish Al-Assat for use a chemical weapons. Obviously I think that something we must do, but what? If we bombarding Syria only punish the pour civilian population, if occidental nation will come in this can be interpreted as a new Crusade.
As I said before war was existing and sadly it will be exits after. Peace movement must be winning at last but war is more inside us. In front this fact we can do two things: first assume it and continue the orgy of blood, or second assume it and prove the change us behavior. But we can’t do is deny the violent of our species and attribute it at disturbed individuals. In 1914 syndicates want to makes an strike for stop the war, unfortunately war began because if one goes the other run after him.